<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>robrrt &#187; security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robrrt.com/tag/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robrrt.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Want more spam? Use Yahoo Groups</title>
		<link>http://www.robrrt.com/2009/06/03/want-more-spam-use-yahoo-groups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robrrt.com/2009/06/03/want-more-spam-use-yahoo-groups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weirdness Abounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robrrt.com/?p=869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When browsing through the message area of any Yahoo Group, you would think that the participating members of that group are safe from potential spambots: However, something very curious happens when you subscribe to messages from a group. If the option is chosen to receive a daily digest via email, everyone who posts a message <p>*** Another Skedaddle from <a href="http://www.robrrt.com/">Robrrt</a> ***<br/><br/><a href="http://www.robrrt.com/2009/06/03/want-more-spam-use-yahoo-groups/">Want more spam? Use Yahoo Groups</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When browsing through the message area of any Yahoo Group, you would think that the participating members of that group are safe from potential spambots:</p>
<div id="attachment_870" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-full wp-image-870" title="yahoo1" src="http://www.robrrt.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/yahoo1.jpg" alt="email address domains are replaced with dots" width="200" height="212" /><p class="wp-caption-text">email address domains are replaced with dots</p></div>
<p>However, something very curious happens when you subscribe to messages from a group. If the option is chosen to receive a daily digest via email, everyone who posts a message to that group has their entire email exposed to subscribers:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-871" title="yahoo2" src="http://www.robrrt.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/yahoo2.jpg" alt="yahoo2" width="427" height="77" /></p>
<p>&#8217;nuff said</p>
<p>*** Another Skedaddle from <a href="http://www.robrrt.com/">Robrrt</a> ***<br/><br/><a href="http://www.robrrt.com/2009/06/03/want-more-spam-use-yahoo-groups/">Want more spam? Use Yahoo Groups</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robrrt.com/2009/06/03/want-more-spam-use-yahoo-groups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dhimmification symptom on the day</title>
		<link>http://www.robrrt.com/2007/07/22/dhimmification-symptom-on-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robrrt.com/2007/07/22/dhimmification-symptom-on-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhimmitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robrrt.com/2007/07/22/dhimmification-symptom-on-the-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to this poll, 83.6% polled think that the TSA is a greater threat to airline security than terrorists (16.4%) The exact poll question was &#8220;What&#8217;s A Greater Threat To Airline Security?&#8221; Not delays. Not lost luggage. Not any of the other inconveniences that go with modern-day air travel. Security. *** Another Skedaddle from Robrrt <p>*** Another Skedaddle from <a href="http://www.robrrt.com/">Robrrt</a> ***<br/><br/><a href="http://www.robrrt.com/2007/07/22/dhimmification-symptom-on-the-day/">Dhimmification symptom on the day</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/polls/whats-a-greater-threat-to-airline-security-279438.php">this poll</a>, 83.6% polled think that the TSA is a greater threat to airline <strong>security</strong> than terrorists (16.4%)</p>
<p>The exact poll question was &#8220;What&#8217;s A Greater Threat To Airline <strong>Security</strong>?&#8221; Not delays. Not lost luggage. Not any of the other inconveniences that go with modern-day air travel. Security.</p>
<p>*** Another Skedaddle from <a href="http://www.robrrt.com/">Robrrt</a> ***<br/><br/><a href="http://www.robrrt.com/2007/07/22/dhimmification-symptom-on-the-day/">Dhimmification symptom on the day</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robrrt.com/2007/07/22/dhimmification-symptom-on-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming soon to American graveyards</title>
		<link>http://www.robrrt.com/2007/07/22/coming-soon-to-american-graveyards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.robrrt.com/2007/07/22/coming-soon-to-american-graveyards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 05:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Randoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhimmification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jihad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john doe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robrrt.com/2007/07/22/coming-soon-to-american-graveyards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More Photoshops&#8230; Background: The &#8220;John Doe&#8221; amendment provided that anonymous whistle-blowers could not be sued for reporting suspicious terror related activities (read full amendment text here.) Since the amendment was attached to an unrelated bill (an outrage in itself), it required a super-majority (60%) to pass. The measure failed by three votes. Here are your <p>*** Another Skedaddle from <a href="http://www.robrrt.com/">Robrrt</a> ***<br/><br/><a href="http://www.robrrt.com/2007/07/22/coming-soon-to-american-graveyards/">Coming soon to American graveyards</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.robrrt.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/tombstone.jpg" alt="" title="United States Tombstone" width="500" height="300" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-408" /></p>
<p><a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/22/the-democrats-want-youto-shut-your-traps/">More Photoshops&#8230;</a></p>
<p>Background:<br />
The &#8220;John Doe&#8221; amendment provided that anonymous whistle-blowers could not be sued for reporting suspicious terror related activities (read full amendment text <a href="http://186kpersecond.com/weblog/2007/07/21/why-are-the-democrats-so-afraid-of-john-doe/">here</a>.) Since the amendment was attached to an unrelated bill (an outrage in itself), it required a super-majority (60%) to pass. The measure failed by three votes. Here are your illustrious senators who voted NAY:</p>
<p>Akaka (D-HI)<br />
Biden (D-DE)<br />
Bingaman (D-NM)<br />
Boxer (D-CA)<br />
Brown (D-OH)<br />
Byrd (D-WV)<br />
Cantwell (D-WA)<br />
Cardin (D-MD)<br />
Carper (D-DE)<br />
Casey (D-PA)<br />
Dodd (D-CT)<br />
Durbin (D-IL)<br />
Feingold (D-WI)<br />
Harkin (D-IA)<br />
Inouye (D-HI)<br />
Kennedy (D-MA)<br />
Kerry (D-MA)<br />
Klobuchar (D-MN)<br />
Kohl (D-WI)<br />
Lautenberg (D-NJ)<br />
Leahy (D-VT)<br />
Levin (D-MI)<br />
Lincoln (D-AR)<br />
McCaskill (D-MO)<br />
Menendez (D-NJ)<br />
Mikulski (D-MD)<br />
Murray (D-WA)<br />
Nelson (D-FL)<br />
Pryor (D-AR)<br />
Reed (D-RI)<br />
Reid (D-NV)<br />
Rockefeller (D-WV)<br />
Salazar (D-CO)<br />
Sanders (I-VT)<br />
Stabenow (D-MI)<br />
Tester (D-MT)<br />
Webb (D-VA)<br />
Whitehouse (D-RI)<br />
Wyden (D-OR)</p>
<p>It is important to note that there were four who did not vote, which could have changed the outcome:</p>
<p>Brownback (R-KS)<br />
Feinstein (D-CA)<br />
Johnson (D-SD)<br />
Obama (D-IL)</p>
<p>It is also interesting to note that two of these are presidential candidates. If they are mum on protecting you now, how will they protect you in the <strike>Oral</strike> Oval Office?</p>
<p>The case of the &#8220;flying imams&#8221; isn&#8217;t about whether or not they were actually planning an act of terrorism, they weren&#8217;t. Their suspicious activities were a ruse. It was about probing, eroding and taking away another line of defense against the dhimmification of America. And Islamic fascism is winning.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong> -The voice of the American people has been heard:<br />
After nearly a week of intense, behind-the-scenes wrangling, congressional negotiators late Tuesday <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,290674,00.html">agreed to include</a> in the pending Sept. 11 security bill sweeping liability protections for citizens who report suspicious activity they fear might be linked to terrorism.</p>
<p>*** Another Skedaddle from <a href="http://www.robrrt.com/">Robrrt</a> ***<br/><br/><a href="http://www.robrrt.com/2007/07/22/coming-soon-to-american-graveyards/">Coming soon to American graveyards</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.robrrt.com/2007/07/22/coming-soon-to-american-graveyards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

